Which is better, MA or PRU?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) currently grades higher than PRU — 84/100 (A grade) vs 34/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — MA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; PRU wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy MA or PRU?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both MA and PRU are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is MA better than PRU for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, MA currently grades higher — 84/100 vs 34/100, a 50-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between MA and PRU on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). MA currently scores 84/100 (A grade); PRU scores 34/100 (F grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, MA or PRU?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. MA and PRU are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, MA or PRU?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are MA and PRU both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this MA vs PRU comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Mastercard

Prudential Financial

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Mastercard

Market cap

$440.5B

Sector

Financials

PRU

Prudential Financial

Market cap

$36.16B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

Mastercard MA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	MA	PRU	Winner
Warren Buffett	84A	34F	MA
Benjamin Graham	84A	30F	MA
Philip Fisher	79B	13F	MA
Peter Lynch	72B	10F	MA
Joel Greenblatt	84A	18F	MA
Charlie Munger	87A	22F	MA
Terry Smith	91A	27F	MA

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	MA	PRU
Market cap	$440.5B	$36.16B
P/E (TTM)	28.3x	10.2x
EV/EBIT	23.1x	8.2x
ROIC (TTM)	51.85%	0.46%
Gross margin	82.96%	32.9%
Net margin	45.88%	5.51%
Revenue CAGR 5y	14.79%	-3.86%
EPS CAGR 5y	17.14%	-18.08%
Debt / Equity	2.8x	0.6x
Dividend yield	0.66%	5.35%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

MA leads on

EPS CAGR 5y17.14%vs -18.08%+195%
Revenue CAGR 5y14.79%vs -3.86%+126%
ROIC (TTM)51.85%vs 0.46%+99%
Market cap$440.5Bvs $36.16B+92%

PRU leads on

Dividend yield5.35%vs 0.66%+88%
Debt / Equity0.6xvs 2.8x+78%
EV/EBIT8.2xvs 23.1x+64%
P/E (TTM)10.2xvs 28.3x+64%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Mastercard

Prudential Financial

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like MA

More like PRU

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis