Which is better, MTN or YUM?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) currently grades higher than MTN — 71/100 (B grade) vs 58/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — MTN wins on Benjamin Graham and Philip Fisher; YUM wins on Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy MTN or YUM?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both MTN and YUM are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is MTN better than YUM for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, YUM currently grades higher — 71/100 vs 58/100, a 13-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between MTN and YUM on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). MTN currently scores 58/100 (C grade); YUM scores 71/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, MTN or YUM?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. MTN and YUM are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, MTN or YUM?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are MTN and YUM both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this MTN vs YUM comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Vail Resorts

Yum! Brands

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

MTN

Vail Resorts

Market cap

$4.55B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

YUM

Yum! Brands

Market cap

$42.76B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Yum! Brands YUM

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	MTN	YUM	Winner
Warren Buffett	58C	71B	YUM
Benjamin Graham	73B	59C	MTN
Philip Fisher	62C	57C	MTN
Peter Lynch	56C	63C	YUM
Joel Greenblatt	32F	63C	YUM
Charlie Munger	57C	76C	YUM
Terry Smith	58D	73C	YUM

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	MTN	YUM
Market cap	$4.55B	$42.76B
P/E (TTM)	19.2x	24.2x
EV/EBIT	12.8x	21.0x
ROIC (TTM)	12.18%	31.39%
Gross margin	59.08%	45.67%
Net margin	7.89%	20.48%
Revenue CAGR 5y	11.62%	5.69%
EPS CAGR 5y	24.19%	1.34%
Debt / Equity	10.5x	-
Dividend yield	7.22%	1.89%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

MTN leads on

EPS CAGR 5y24.19%vs 1.34%+94%
Dividend yield7.22%vs 1.89%+74%
Revenue CAGR 5y11.62%vs 5.69%+51%
EV/EBIT12.8xvs 21.0x+39%

YUM leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 10.5x+116%
Market cap$42.76Bvs $4.55B+89%
Net margin20.48%vs 7.89%+61%
ROIC (TTM)31.39%vs 12.18%+61%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Vail Resorts

Yum! Brands

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like MTN

More like YUM

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis