Stock comparison
Deckers Outdoor
NIO
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
DECK
Deckers Outdoor
Market cap
$15.14B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
NIO
NIO
Market cap
$12.26B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Deckers Outdoor DECK
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | DECK | NIO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 77B | 12F | DECK |
| Benjamin Graham | 72B | 57D | DECK |
| Philip Fisher | 77B | 35D | DECK |
| Peter Lynch | 61C | 70C | NIO |
| Joel Greenblatt | 52C | 0F | DECK |
| Charlie Munger | 76B | 19F | DECK |
| Terry Smith | 83A | 14F | DECK |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | DECK | NIO |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $15.14B | $12.26B |
| P/E (TTM) | 13.2x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 9.8x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 32.7% | -26.88% |
| Gross margin | 57.54% | 13.6% |
| Net margin | 19.35% | -17.71% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 18.3% | 23.88% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 29.38% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.1x | 6.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
DECK leads on
- Net margin19.35%vs -17.71%+192%
- ROIC (TTM)32.7%vs -26.88%+182%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 6.3x+98%
- Gross margin57.54%vs 13.6%+76%
NIO leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 9.8x+170%
- P/E (TTM)-vs 13.2x+151%
- Revenue CAGR 5y23.88%vs 18.3%+23%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.