Which is better, PGR or TW?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW) currently grades higher than PGR — 73/100 (B grade) vs 59/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — PGR wins on Joel Greenblatt and Charlie Munger; TW wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy PGR or TW?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both PGR and TW are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is PGR better than TW for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, TW currently grades higher — 73/100 vs 59/100, a 14-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between PGR and TW on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). PGR currently scores 59/100 (C grade); TW scores 73/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, PGR or TW?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. PGR and TW are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, PGR or TW?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are PGR and TW both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this PGR vs TW comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

The Progressive

Tradeweb Markets

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

PGR

The Progressive

Market cap

$116.58B

Sector

Financials

Tradeweb Markets

Market cap

$22.63B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

Tradeweb Markets TW

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	PGR	TW	Winner
Warren Buffett	59C	73B	TW
Benjamin Graham	51C	78B	TW
Philip Fisher	57C	77C	TW
Peter Lynch	52C	60C	TW
Joel Greenblatt	50C	48D	PGR
Charlie Munger	55C	54D	PGR
Terry Smith	60C	62D	TW

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	PGR	TW
Market cap	$116.58B	$22.63B
P/E (TTM)	10.1x	27.1x
EV/EBIT	8.8x	25.9x
ROIC (TTM)	34.57%	9.57%
Gross margin	28.44%	67.98%
Net margin	12.93%	40.25%
Revenue CAGR 5y	16.44%	17.51%
EPS CAGR 5y	35.69%	35.51%
Debt / Equity	0.3x	0.0x
Dividend yield	6.96%	0.45%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

PGR leads on

Dividend yield6.96%vs 0.45%+94%
Market cap$116.58Bvs $22.63B+81%
ROIC (TTM)34.57%vs 9.57%+72%
EV/EBIT8.8xvs 25.9x+66%

TW leads on

Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+92%
Net margin40.25%vs 12.93%+68%
Gross margin67.98%vs 28.44%+58%
Revenue CAGR 5y17.51%vs 16.44%+6%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

The Progressive

Tradeweb Markets

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like PGR

More like TW

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis