Which is better, DECK or RMS.PA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) currently grades higher than DECK — 79/100 (B grade) vs 77/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — DECK wins on none; RMS.PA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy DECK or RMS.PA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both DECK and RMS.PA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is DECK better than RMS.PA for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (77/100 vs 79/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between DECK and RMS.PA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). DECK currently scores 77/100 (B grade); RMS.PA scores 79/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, DECK or RMS.PA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. DECK and RMS.PA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, DECK or RMS.PA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are DECK and RMS.PA both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this DECK vs RMS.PA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Deckers Outdoor

DECK$14.35BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions

RMS.PA$176.07BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions

DECK 07 RMS.PA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

DECK0wins

7winsRMS.PA

Warren Buffett

77B

B79

Benjamin Graham

72B

A90

Philip Fisher

77B

B84

Peter Lynch

61C

C69

Joel Greenblatt

52D

C61

Charlie Munger

76B

A86

Terry Smith

83B

A85

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	DECK	RMS.PA
Market cap	$14.35B	$176.07B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.2x	38.1x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.8x	23.8x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 32.7%	24.18%
Gross margin	57.54%	71.11% Winner
Net margin	19.35%	28.27% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 18.3%	11.31%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 29.38%	16.93%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.1x Winner
Dividend yield	0.0%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

DECK leads on

P/E (TTM)13.2xvs 38.1x+65%
EV/EBIT9.8xvs 23.8x+59%
EPS CAGR 5y29.38%vs 16.93%+42%
Revenue CAGR 5y18.3%vs 11.31%+38%

RMS.PA leads on

Market cap$176.07Bvs $14.35B+92%
Net margin28.27%vs 19.35%+32%
Gross margin71.11%vs 57.54%+19%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.1x+5%

More like DECK

DECK vs GAW.L DECK vs GRGD.TO DECK vs 2059.TW DECK vs ALWN.AT

More like RMS.PA

RMS.PA vs GAW.L RMS.PA vs GRGD.TO RMS.PA vs 2059.TW RMS.PA vs ALWN.AT

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for DECK Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RMS.PA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	DECK	RMS.PA
Market cap	$14.35B	$176.07B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.2x	38.1x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.8x	23.8x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 32.7%	24.18%
Gross margin	57.54%	71.11% Winner
Net margin	19.35%	28.27% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 18.3%	11.31%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 29.38%	16.93%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.1x Winner
Dividend yield	0.0%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

DECK leads on

P/E (TTM)13.2xvs 38.1x+65%
EV/EBIT9.8xvs 23.8x+59%
EPS CAGR 5y29.38%vs 16.93%+42%
Revenue CAGR 5y18.3%vs 11.31%+38%

RMS.PA leads on

Market cap$176.07Bvs $14.35B+92%
Net margin28.27%vs 19.35%+32%
Gross margin71.11%vs 57.54%+19%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.1x+5%