Which is better, RMS.PA or SSPG.L?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) currently grades higher than SSPG.L — 79/100 (B grade) vs 46/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — RMS.PA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; SSPG.L wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy RMS.PA or SSPG.L?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both RMS.PA and SSPG.L are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is RMS.PA better than SSPG.L for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, RMS.PA currently grades higher — 79/100 vs 46/100, a 33-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between RMS.PA and SSPG.L on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). RMS.PA currently scores 79/100 (B grade); SSPG.L scores 46/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, RMS.PA or SSPG.L?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. RMS.PA and SSPG.L are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, RMS.PA or SSPG.L?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are RMS.PA and SSPG.L both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) and SSP Group plc (SSPG.L) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this RMS.PA vs SSPG.L comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions

RMS.PA$171.3BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

SSP Group

SSPG.L$1.63BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions

RMS.PA 70 SSPG.L

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

RMS.PA7wins

0winsSSPG.L

Warren Buffett

79B

D46

Benjamin Graham

90A

D53

Philip Fisher

84B

F44

Peter Lynch

69C

C64

Joel Greenblatt

61C

F37

Charlie Munger

86A

F34

Terry Smith

85A

F33

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	RMS.PA	SSPG.L
Market cap	Winner: $171.3B	$1.63B
P/E (TTM)	38.1x	- Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 23.8x	28.4x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 24.18%	3.61%
Gross margin	Winner: 71.11%	46.91%
Net margin	Winner: 28.27%	-2.04%
Revenue CAGR 5y	11.31%	18.52% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	16.93%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.1x	26.3x
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

RMS.PA leads on

Net margin28.27%vs -2.04%+107%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 26.3x+100%
Market cap$171.3Bvs $1.63B+99%
ROIC (TTM)24.18%vs 3.61%+85%

SSPG.L leads on

P/E (TTM)-vs 38.1x+144%
Revenue CAGR 5y18.52%vs 11.31%+39%

More like RMS.PA

RMS.PA vs GAW.L RMS.PA vs GRGD.TO RMS.PA vs 2059.TW RMS.PA vs DECK

More like SSPG.L

SSPG.L vs GAW.L SSPG.L vs GRGD.TO SSPG.L vs 2059.TW SSPG.L vs DECK

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RMS.PA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for SSPG.L

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	RMS.PA	SSPG.L
Market cap	Winner: $171.3B	$1.63B
P/E (TTM)	38.1x	- Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 23.8x	28.4x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 24.18%	3.61%
Gross margin	Winner: 71.11%	46.91%
Net margin	Winner: 28.27%	-2.04%
Revenue CAGR 5y	11.31%	18.52% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	16.93%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.1x	26.3x
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

RMS.PA leads on

Net margin28.27%vs -2.04%+107%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 26.3x+100%
Market cap$171.3Bvs $1.63B+99%
ROIC (TTM)24.18%vs 3.61%+85%

SSPG.L leads on

P/E (TTM)-vs 38.1x+144%
Revenue CAGR 5y18.52%vs 11.31%+39%