Which is better, USAC or VET?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) currently grades higher than VET — 69/100 (C grade) vs 34/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — USAC wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; VET wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy USAC or VET?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both USAC and VET are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is USAC better than VET for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, USAC currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 34/100, a 35-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between USAC and VET on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). USAC currently scores 69/100 (C grade); VET scores 34/100 (F grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, USAC or VET?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. USAC and VET are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, USAC or VET?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are USAC and VET both Energy stocks?

Yes — both USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) and Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this USAC vs VET comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

USA Compression Partners, LP

Vermilion Energy

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

USAC

Market cap

$3.51B

Sector

Energy

VET

Vermilion Energy

Market cap

$1.88B

Sector

Energy

Overall winner

USA Compression Partners, LP USAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	USAC	VET	Winner
Warren Buffett	69C	34F	USAC
Benjamin Graham	84A	16F	USAC
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	USAC	VET
Market cap	$3.51B	$1.88B
P/E (TTM)	32.8x	-
EV/EBIT	20.6x	23.8x
ROIC (TTM)	8.89%	6.72%
Gross margin	51.61%	35.87%
Net margin	11.91%	-44.92%
Revenue CAGR 5y	12.07%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

USAC leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs -5.66%+147%
Net margin11.91%vs -44.92%+127%
Dividend yield7.08%vs 2.98%+58%
Market cap$3.51Bvs $1.88B

More like USAC

USAC vs NRP USAC vs BSM USAC vs DMLP USAC vs HESM USAC vs WES USAC vs AM

More like VET

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.