Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Corning
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
GLW
Corning
Market cap
$165.17B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | GLW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 43D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 76B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 50C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 55C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 44D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 45D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 38D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | GLW |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $346.51B | $165.17B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.7x | 91.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.8x | 74.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 7.89% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 36.31% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 11.09% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 2.64% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 9.37% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.8x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.58% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.8x+64%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 7.89%+63%
- Net margin29.31%vs 11.09%+62%
- P/E (TTM)40.7xvs 91.5x+55%
GLW leads on
- Dividend yield0.58%vs 0.42%+28%
- EPS CAGR 5y9.37%vs 7.72%+18%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.