Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Intuit
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$339.94B
Sector
Technology
INTU
Intuit
Market cap
$85.85B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | INTU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 71B | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 72B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 73B | INTU |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 63C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 54C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 67B | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 67B | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | INTU |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $339.94B | $85.85B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 25.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 23.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 16.42% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 81.23% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 21.57% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 18.24% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 15.97% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.18% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Market cap$339.94Bvs $85.85B+75%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.4x+32%
- Net margin29.31%vs 21.57%+26%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 16.42%+24%
INTU leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y18.24%vs 5.31%+71%
- Dividend yield1.18%vs 0.45%+62%
- EPS CAGR 5y15.97%vs 7.72%+52%
- EV/EBIT23.1xvs 41.0x+44%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.