Stock comparison
Applied Materials
AppFolio
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
APPF
AppFolio
Market cap
$5.91B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | APPF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 55C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 71D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 66B | APPF |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 73B | APPF |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 70C | APPF |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 61D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 65B | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | APPF |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $5.91B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 38.4x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 37.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 28.35% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 63.24% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 15.27% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 27.54% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 2.39% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $5.91B+98%
- Net margin29.31%vs 15.27%+48%
APPF leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y2.39%vs 7.72%+97%
- Revenue CAGR 5y27.54%vs 5.31%+81%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.3x+71%
- ROIC (TTM)28.35%vs 21.6%+24%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.