Stock comparison
Diamondback Energy
FANG$56.46BEnergy Market cap, Sector
USA Compression Partners, LP
USAC$3.51BEnergy Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
USA Compression Partners, LP
FANG 07 USAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
FANG0wins
7winsUSAC
57D
C69
53D
B84
57D
C61
27F
B71
16F
F35
47D
C68
40F
C64
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | FANG | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $56.46B | $3.51B |
| P/E (TTM) | 140.5x | 32.8x Winner |
| EV/EBIT | Winner: 14.2x | 20.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 5.09% | 8.89% Winner |
| Gross margin | 41.83% | 51.61% Winner |
| Net margin | 2.65% | 11.91% Winner |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | Winner: 22.16% | 12.07% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -17.47% | - |
| Debt / Equity | Winner: 0.4x | 9.5x |
| Dividend yield | 2.07% | 7.08% Winner |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
FANG leads on
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 9.5x+96%
- Market cap$56.46Bvs $3.51B+94%
- Revenue CAGR 5y22.16%vs 12.07%+46%
- EV/EBIT14.2xvs 20.6x+31%
USAC leads on
- Net margin11.91%vs 2.65%+78%
- P/E (TTM)32.8xvs 140.5x+77%
- Dividend yield7.08%vs 2.07%+71%
- ROIC (TTM)8.89%vs 5.09%+43%
More like FANG
More like USAC
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.