Which is better, GRGD.TO or MAS?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Groupe Dynamite Inc. (GRGD.TO) currently grades higher than MAS — 84/100 (A grade) vs 65/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GRGD.TO wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; MAS wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GRGD.TO or MAS?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GRGD.TO and MAS are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GRGD.TO better than MAS for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GRGD.TO currently grades higher — 84/100 vs 65/100, a 19-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between GRGD.TO and MAS on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GRGD.TO currently scores 84/100 (A grade); MAS scores 65/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GRGD.TO or MAS?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GRGD.TO and MAS are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GRGD.TO or MAS?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GRGD.TO and MAS both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Groupe Dynamite Inc. (GRGD.TO) and Masco Corporation (MAS) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GRGD.TO vs MAS comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Groupe Dynamite

GRGD.TO$5.43BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Masco

MAS$15.5BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Groupe Dynamite

GRGD.TO 70 MAS

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

GRGD.TO7wins

0winsMAS

Warren Buffett

84B

C65

Benjamin Graham

85A

D59

Philip Fisher

92A

D54

Peter Lynch

74B

F43

Joel Greenblatt

79B

D46

Charlie Munger

92A

C68

Terry Smith

90A

C66

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GRGD.TO	MAS
Market cap	$5.43B	$15.5B Winner
P/E (TTM)	29.6x	16.9x Winner
EV/EBIT	20.6x	13.4x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 49.19%	26.31%
Gross margin	Winner: 63.85%	35.41%
Net margin	Winner: 19.25%	10.9%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 23.39%	-2.52%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 55.64%	24.21%
Debt / Equity	5.1x	- Winner
Dividend yield	-	1.8%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GRGD.TO leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y23.39%vs -2.52%+111%
EPS CAGR 5y55.64%vs 24.21%+56%
ROIC (TTM)49.19%vs 26.31%+47%
Gross margin63.85%vs 35.41%+45%

MAS leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 5.1x+137%
Market cap$15.5Bvs $5.43B+65%
P/E (TTM)16.9xvs 29.6x+43%
EV/EBIT13.4xvs 20.6x+35%

More like GRGD.TO

GRGD.TO vs GAW.L GRGD.TO vs WINA GRGD.TO vs RMS.PA GRGD.TO vs 2059.TW

More like MAS

MAS vs GAW.L MAS vs WINA MAS vs RMS.PA MAS vs 2059.TW

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GRGD.TO Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for MAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Groupe Dynamite

GRGD.TO$5.43BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Masco

MAS$15.5BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Groupe Dynamite

GRGD.TO 70 MAS

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

GRGD.TO7wins

0winsMAS

Warren Buffett

84B

C65

Benjamin Graham

85A

D59

Philip Fisher

92A

D54

Peter Lynch

74B

F43

Joel Greenblatt

79B

D46

Charlie Munger

92A

C68

Terry Smith

90A

C66

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GRGD.TO	MAS
Market cap	$5.43B	$15.5B Winner
P/E (TTM)	29.6x	16.9x Winner
EV/EBIT	20.6x	13.4x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 49.19%	26.31%
Gross margin	Winner: 63.85%	35.41%
Net margin	Winner: 19.25%	10.9%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 23.39%	-2.52%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 55.64%	24.21%
Debt / Equity	5.1x	- Winner
Dividend yield	-	1.8%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GRGD.TO leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y23.39%vs -2.52%+111%
EPS CAGR 5y55.64%vs 24.21%+56%
ROIC (TTM)49.19%vs 26.31%+47%
Gross margin63.85%vs 35.41%+45%

MAS leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 5.1x+137%
Market cap$15.5Bvs $5.43B+65%
P/E (TTM)16.9xvs 29.6x+43%
EV/EBIT13.4xvs 20.6x+35%

More like GRGD.TO

GRGD.TO vs GAW.L GRGD.TO vs WINA GRGD.TO vs RMS.PA GRGD.TO vs 2059.TW

More like MAS

MAS vs GAW.L MAS vs WINA MAS vs RMS.PA MAS vs 2059.TW

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GRGD.TO Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for MAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.