Stock comparison
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
Par Pacific Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
Market cap
$1.43B
Sector
Energy
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings
Market cap
$2.9B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP KRP
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | KRP | PARR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 70C | 41D | KRP |
| Benjamin Graham | 68B | 33F | KRP |
| Philip Fisher | 62C | 26F | KRP |
| Peter Lynch | 42D | 46D | PARR |
| Joel Greenblatt | 35D | 37D | PARR |
| Charlie Munger | 63D | 35D | KRP |
| Terry Smith | 62D | 32F | KRP |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | KRP | PARR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.43B | $2.9B |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.1x | 6.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 13.9x | 8.2x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 11.36% | 16.27% |
| Gross margin | 94.16% | 18.11% |
| Net margin | 22.7% | 6.02% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 16.96% | 12.2% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -7.31% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.7x | 1.1x |
| Dividend yield | 10.28% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
KRP leads on
- Dividend yield10.28%vs 0.0%+100%
- Gross margin94.16%vs 18.11%+81%
- Net margin22.7%vs 6.02%+73%
- Debt / Equity0.7xvs 1.1x+40%
PARR leads on
- P/E (TTM)6.3xvs 19.1x+67%
- Market cap$2.9Bvs $1.43B+51%
- EV/EBIT8.2xvs 13.9x+41%
- ROIC (TTM)16.27%vs 11.36%+30%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.