Which is better, SEI or USAC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) currently grades higher than SEI — 69/100 (C grade) vs 52/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — SEI wins on Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt; USAC wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy SEI or USAC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both SEI and USAC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is SEI better than USAC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, USAC currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 52/100, a 17-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between SEI and USAC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). SEI currently scores 52/100 (D grade); USAC scores 69/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, SEI or USAC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. SEI and USAC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, SEI or USAC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are SEI and USAC both Energy stocks?

Yes — both Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (SEI) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this SEI vs USAC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Solaris Energy Infrastructure

SEI$5.33BEnergy Market cap, Sector

USA Compression Partners, LP

USAC$3.51BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

USA Compression Partners, LP

SEI 34 USAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

SEI3wins

4winsUSAC

Warren Buffett

52D

C69

Benjamin Graham

65C

B84

Philip Fisher

66C

C61

Peter Lynch

76B

B71

Joel Greenblatt

42F

F35

Charlie Munger

52D

C68

Terry Smith

42F

C64

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	SEI	USAC
Market cap	Winner: $5.33B	$3.51B
P/E (TTM)	84.2x	32.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	49.0x	20.6x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	4.34%	8.89% Winner
Gross margin	34.0%	51.61% Winner
Net margin	6.69%	11.91% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 40.61%	12.07%
EPS CAGR 5y	-	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 2.1x	9.5x
Dividend yield	0.64%	7.08% Winner

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

SEI leads on

Debt / Equity2.1xvs 9.5x+78%
Revenue CAGR 5y40.61%vs 12.07%+70%
Market cap$5.33Bvs $3.51B+34%

USAC leads on

Dividend yield7.08%vs 0.64%+91%
P/E (TTM)32.8xvs 84.2x+61%
EV/EBIT20.6xvs 49.0x+58%
ROIC (TTM)8.89%vs 4.34%+51%

More like SEI

SEI vs TPL SEI vs VAR.OL SEI vs GTT.PA SEI vs RATI.TA

More like USAC

USAC vs TPL USAC vs VAR.OL USAC vs GTT.PA USAC vs RATI.TA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for SEI Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for USAC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Solaris Energy Infrastructure

SEI$5.33BEnergy Market cap, Sector

USA Compression Partners, LP

USAC$3.51BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

USA Compression Partners, LP

SEI 34 USAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

SEI3wins

4winsUSAC

Warren Buffett

52D

C69

Benjamin Graham

65C

B84

Philip Fisher

66C

C61

Peter Lynch

76B

B71

Joel Greenblatt

42F

F35

Charlie Munger

52D

C68

Terry Smith

42F

C64

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	SEI	USAC
Market cap	Winner: $5.33B	$3.51B
P/E (TTM)	84.2x	32.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	49.0x	20.6x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	4.34%	8.89% Winner
Gross margin	34.0%	51.61% Winner
Net margin	6.69%	11.91% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 40.61%	12.07%
EPS CAGR 5y	-	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 2.1x	9.5x
Dividend yield	0.64%	7.08% Winner

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

SEI leads on

Debt / Equity2.1xvs 9.5x+78%
Revenue CAGR 5y40.61%vs 12.07%+70%
Market cap$5.33Bvs $3.51B+34%

USAC leads on

Dividend yield7.08%vs 0.64%+91%
P/E (TTM)32.8xvs 84.2x+61%
EV/EBIT20.6xvs 49.0x+58%
ROIC (TTM)8.89%vs 4.34%+51%

More like SEI

SEI vs TPL SEI vs VAR.OL SEI vs GTT.PA SEI vs RATI.TA

More like USAC

USAC vs TPL USAC vs VAR.OL USAC vs GTT.PA USAC vs RATI.TA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for SEI Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for USAC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.