Stock comparison
Deckers Outdoor
Ford
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
DECK
Deckers Outdoor
Market cap
$15.14B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
F
Ford
Market cap
$57.94B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Deckers Outdoor DECK
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | DECK | F | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 77B | 31F | DECK |
| Benjamin Graham | 72B | 37D | DECK |
| Philip Fisher | 77B | 19F | DECK |
| Peter Lynch | 61C | 24F | DECK |
| Joel Greenblatt | 52C | 40D | DECK |
| Charlie Munger | 76B | 21F | DECK |
| Terry Smith | 83A | 14F | DECK |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | DECK | F |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $15.14B | $57.94B |
| P/E (TTM) | 13.2x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 9.8x | 75.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 32.7% | 0.99% |
| Gross margin | 57.54% | 9.18% |
| Net margin | 19.35% | -3.22% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 18.3% | 8.26% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 29.38% | -13.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.1x | 4.2x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 4.47% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
DECK leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y29.38%vs -13.6%+146%
- Net margin19.35%vs -3.22%+117%
- ROIC (TTM)32.7%vs 0.99%+97%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 4.2x+97%
F leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 13.2x+166%
- Dividend yield4.47%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$57.94Bvs $15.14B+74%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.