invest-like vs Finbox
Precio, funciones, cobertura y una respuesta clara sobre cuál elegir. Escrito por alguien que ha usado ambos, y está en el equipo de invest-like. No fingimos ser neutrales; te decimos dónde Finbox sigue ganando y dónde invest-like es la mejor elección.
Última revisión:
Finbox es a quant-style stock screener with 100+ factor models, backtesting, and pre-built value/quality composites. invest-like es una herramienta verdict-first que puntúa cada acción contra siete frameworks de inversores nombrados (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) y entrega veredictos Buffett de 5 pilares generados por IA con el razonamiento escrito. Para la mayoría de los inversores minoristas y amateurs serios, invest-like es la herramienta más afilada: los únicos puntos donde Finbox sigue ganando se listan honestamente abajo.
invest-like es la única herramienta aquí que publica la precisión de sus veredictos. El screen de consenso de 7 frameworks rinde +73.8% vs el S&P 500 a cinco años, cada selección registrada públicamente, con la fecha de entrada bloqueada.
Ver el track record publicadoComparación de funciones
Investor frameworks
invest-like
7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)
Finbox
Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock
invest-like
Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning
Finbox
No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A
invest-like
Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)
Finbox
None
Multi-investor debate
invest-like
Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate
Finbox
None
Stock universe
invest-like
21,000+ US-focused
Finbox
Most global stocks (US-heavy, with international coverage)
Cheapest paid tier
invest-like
€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)
Finbox
$19-79/mo depending on tier; backtesting requires higher tier
Lifetime option
invest-like
€399 one-time (Founders)
Finbox
No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI
invest-like
EN, DE, FR, ES, PT
Finbox
English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache
invest-like
Yes: every prompt versioned
Finbox
Proprietary / opaque
| Función | invest-like | Finbox |
|---|---|---|
| Investor frameworks | 7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) | Proprietary scoring |
| AI verdict per stock | Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning | No structured AI verdict |
| LLM chat / Q&A | Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters) | None |
| Multi-investor debate | Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate | None |
| Stock universe | 21,000+ US-focused | Most global stocks (US-heavy, with international coverage) |
| Cheapest paid tier | €12/mo equivalent (€144/yr) | $19-79/mo depending on tier; backtesting requires higher tier |
| Lifetime option | €399 one-time (Founders) | No lifetime tier |
| Multi-language UI | EN, DE, FR, ES, PT | English-only (typically) |
| Open verdict cache | Yes: every prompt versioned | Proprietary / opaque |
Elige Finbox si…
- You actively run pre-built quant factors (Magic Formula, Piotroski F-Score, value composite) and that is how you select stocks.
- You backtest factor strategies regularly and need the 100-factor library specifically for systematic investing.
Elige invest-like si…
- You want a plain-English verdict per investor framework instead of assembling factor screens yourself.
- You want AI-grounded analysis: Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, Boardroom. Finbox has none.
- You need halal screening (AAOIFI Standard 21).
- You are price-sensitive, invest-like Pro is EUR 144/yr vs Finbox Pro tier roughly twice that price.
Qué hace bien Finbox
- 100+ pre-built quant factors (Magic Formula, Piotroski F-Score, value composites) ready to screen with.
- Solid factor backtesting against historical data on the higher tiers, useful for systematic investors.
- Strong global coverage if you screen international names regularly.
Dónde invest-like es más fuerte
- Seven named investor-framework verdicts per stock with structured reasoning, Finbox surfaces the underlying factors, but invest-like ships the framework verdict on top.
- Buffett Brain 5-pillar AI verdict per stock with the reasoning written out in plain English. Finbox has factor scores, not narrative reasoning.
- Ask Buffett RAG against real Berkshire shareholder letters, no Finbox equivalent.
- Boardroom 4-investor debate per stock with skeptic, unique to invest-like.
- Halal Mode (AAOIFI Standard 21) on every ticker, Finbox has no religious-compliance screen.
- EUR 144/yr (EUR 12/mo equivalent) vs Finbox $19-79/mo, cheaper at the entry tier.
- Plain-English UX vs Finbox quant-factor surface area, faster for users who want a judgment call rather than to assemble factor screens themselves.
De qué se quejan realmente los usuarios de Finbox
Patrones recurrentes de reseñas públicas en Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 y AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Parafraseados, no citas directas.
- 100-factor library is powerful but heavy, users without quant background report a steep onboarding curve.
- Backtesting requires higher tiers: the cheapest plan delivers screening but the historical-test feature most reviewers cite is paywalled higher up.
- No narrative analysis or AI verdict, users do all qualitative interpretation themselves from raw factor scores.
Los listamos honestamente porque construimos invest-like específicamente para evitar cada uno: veredictos por inversor estructurados (sin puntuación opaca), razonamiento Buffett Brain escrito (sin conclusiones enterradas), metodología publicada, y precios para individuos, no instituciones.
Preguntas frecuentes
Is invest-like a better choice than Finbox?+
For value investors who want framework-grounded verdicts, yes. Finbox is a quant factor screener: it surfaces underlying ratios and lets you screen with them. invest-like sits the verdict layer on top: seven named investor frameworks scored per stock, plus Buffett Brain AI verdict with reasoning. If you actively backtest factor strategies, Finbox remains the right pick. If you want a verdict-first tool, invest-like is the alternative.
Does Finbox have AI features?+
No. Finbox is classical quant, factor scores, backtesting, screening. invest-like ships three AI-native features Finbox doesn't: Buffett Brain (5-pillar AI verdict), Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters), and Boardroom (4-investor debate).
Can I use both: Finbox for screening, invest-like for per-stock verdicts?+
Yes. The natural division: Finbox screens the universe down to a shortlist using quant factors, then invest-like delivers the per-stock framework verdict on each name. Most invest-like users find the strategy screener built into the consensus page covers most of the screening need, but stacking the two is reasonable for hardcore quant + value workflows.
What about halal investing?+
invest-like is the only platform between the two with an integrated AAOIFI Standard 21 halal screen. Finbox doesn't ship religious-compliance screening as a first-class feature.
Prueba invest-like en menos de 30 segundos
Ve el veredicto Buffett en Apple, NVIDIA o cualquiera de 21.000+ acciones.
Otras comparativas
invest-like vs
Simply Wall St
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Stock Unlock
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
TIKR
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
GuruFocus
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
AlphaPicks
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Composer
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Magnifi
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
YCharts
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Zacks
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Morningstar
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Motley Fool
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Value Line
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Seeking Alpha
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Koyfin
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Stock Rover
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Fiscal.ai (formerly FinChat)
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
StockAnalysis.com
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Atom Finance
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Portfolio Visualizer
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Ziggma
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Wisesheets
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
SimplyETF
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Public.com
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
TipRanks
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Danelfin
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Stockopedia
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Finviz
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
WallStreetZen
Leer comparativa