Comparativa · 2026

invest-like vs Finbox

Precio, funciones, cobertura y una respuesta clara sobre cuál elegir. Escrito por alguien que ha usado ambos - y está en el equipo de invest-like. No fingimos ser neutrales; te decimos dónde Finbox sigue ganando y dónde invest-like es la mejor elección.

Última revisión: 16 de mayo de 2026

Veredicto rápido

Finbox es a quant-style stock screener with 100+ factor models, backtesting, and pre-built value/quality composites. invest-like es una herramienta verdict-first que puntúa cada acción contra siete frameworks de inversores nombrados (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) y entrega veredictos Buffett de 5 pilares generados por IA con el razonamiento escrito. Para la mayoría de los inversores minoristas y amateurs serios, invest-like es la herramienta más afilada - los únicos puntos donde Finbox sigue ganando se listan honestamente abajo.

Comparación de funciones

Función	invest-like	Finbox
Investor frameworks	7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)	Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock	Buffett Brain - 5-pillar verdict with reasoning	No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A	Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)	None
Multi-investor debate	Boardroom - 4 legendary investors debate	None
Stock universe	12,000+ US-focused	Most global stocks (US-heavy, with international coverage)
Cheapest paid tier	€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)	$19-79/mo depending on tier; backtesting requires higher tier
Lifetime option	€299 one-time (Founders)	No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI	EN, DE, FR, ES, PT	English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache	Yes - every prompt versioned	Proprietary / opaque

Elige Finbox si…

You actively run pre-built quant factors (Magic Formula, Piotroski F-Score, value composite) and that is how you select stocks.
You backtest factor strategies regularly and need the 100-factor library specifically for systematic investing.

Elige invest-like si…

You want a plain-English verdict per investor framework instead of assembling factor screens yourself.
You want AI-grounded analysis: Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, Boardroom. Finbox has none.
You need halal screening (AAOIFI Standard 21).
You are price-sensitive - invest-like Pro is EUR 144/yr vs Finbox Pro tier roughly twice that price.
You want a buy-once path (EUR 399 lifetime) instead of subscription-only.

Qué hace bien Finbox

100+ pre-built quant factors (Magic Formula, Piotroski F-Score, value composites) ready to screen with.
Solid factor backtesting against historical data on the higher tiers - useful for systematic investors.
Strong global coverage if you screen international names regularly.

Dónde invest-like es más fuerte

Seven named investor-framework verdicts per stock with structured reasoning - Finbox surfaces the underlying factors, but invest-like ships the framework verdict on top.
Buffett Brain 5-pillar AI verdict per stock with the reasoning written out in plain English. Finbox has factor scores, not narrative reasoning.
Ask Buffett RAG against real Berkshire shareholder letters - no Finbox equivalent.
Boardroom 4-investor debate per stock with skeptic - unique to invest-like.
Halal Mode (AAOIFI Standard 21) on every ticker - Finbox has no religious-compliance screen.
EUR 144/yr (EUR 12/mo equivalent) or EUR 299 lifetime vs Finbox $19-79/mo recurring with no lifetime option - cheaper at the entry tier with a buy-once path.
Plain-English UX vs Finbox quant-factor surface area - faster for users who want a judgment call rather than to assemble factor screens themselves.

De qué se quejan realmente los usuarios de Finbox

Patrones recurrentes de reseñas públicas en Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 y AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Parafraseados, no citas directas.

100-factor library is powerful but heavy - users without quant background report a steep onboarding curve.
Backtesting requires higher tiers - the cheapest plan delivers screening but the historical-test feature most reviewers cite is paywalled higher up.
No narrative analysis or AI verdict - users do all qualitative interpretation themselves from raw factor scores.

Los listamos honestamente porque construimos invest-like específicamente para evitar cada uno: veredictos por inversor estructurados (sin puntuación opaca), razonamiento Buffett Brain escrito (sin conclusiones enterradas), metodología publicada, y precios para individuos, no instituciones.

Preguntas frecuentes

Is invest-like a better choice than Finbox?+

For value investors who want framework-grounded verdicts, yes. Finbox is a quant factor screener - it surfaces underlying ratios and lets you screen with them. invest-like sits the verdict layer on top: seven named investor frameworks scored per stock, plus Buffett Brain AI verdict with reasoning. If you actively backtest factor strategies, Finbox remains the right pick. If you want a verdict-first tool, invest-like is the alternative.

Does Finbox have AI features?+

No. Finbox is classical quant - factor scores, backtesting, screening. invest-like ships three AI-native features Finbox doesn't: Buffett Brain (5-pillar AI verdict), Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters), and Boardroom (4-investor debate).

Can I use both - Finbox for screening, invest-like for per-stock verdicts?+

Yes. The natural division: Finbox screens the universe down to a shortlist using quant factors, then invest-like delivers the per-stock framework verdict on each name. Most invest-like users find the strategy screener built into the consensus page covers most of the screening need, but stacking the two is reasonable for hardcore quant + value workflows.

What about halal investing?+

invest-like is the only platform between the two with an integrated AAOIFI Standard 21 halal screen. Finbox doesn't ship religious-compliance screening as a first-class feature.

Prueba invest-like en menos de 30 segundos

Ve el veredicto Buffett en Apple, NVIDIA o cualquiera de 12.000+ acciones.

Ver el veredicto de Apple Explorar los 7 frameworks

Otras comparativas

invest-like vs

Simply Wall St