Comparativa · 2026

invest-like vs Ziggma

Precio, funciones, cobertura y una respuesta clara sobre cuál elegir. Escrito por alguien que ha usado ambos, y está en el equipo de invest-like. No fingimos ser neutrales; te decimos dónde Ziggma sigue ganando y dónde invest-like es la mejor elección.

Última revisión: 16 de mayo de 2026

Veredicto rápido

Ziggma es a portfolio-tracking and analytics platform with a proprietary stock-scoring algorithm aimed at the european retail market. invest-like es una herramienta verdict-first que puntúa cada acción contra siete frameworks de inversores nombrados (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) y entrega veredictos Buffett de 5 pilares generados por IA con el razonamiento escrito. Para la mayoría de los inversores minoristas y amateurs serios, invest-like es la herramienta más afilada: los únicos puntos donde Ziggma sigue ganando se listan honestamente abajo.

Track record

invest-like es la única herramienta aquí que publica la precisión de sus veredictos. El screen de consenso de 7 frameworks rinde +73.8% vs el S&P 500 a cinco años, cada selección registrada públicamente, con la fecha de entrada bloqueada.

Ver el track record publicado

Comparación de funciones

Investor frameworks

invest-like

7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)

Ziggma

Proprietary scoring

AI verdict per stock

invest-like

Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning

Ziggma

No structured AI verdict

LLM chat / Q&A

invest-like

Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)

Ziggma

None

Multi-investor debate

invest-like

Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate

Ziggma

None

Stock universe

invest-like

21,000+ US-focused

Ziggma

Major US and European-listed stocks

Cheapest paid tier

invest-like

€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)

Ziggma

Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo

Lifetime option

invest-like

€399 one-time (Founders)

Ziggma

No lifetime tier

Multi-language UI

invest-like

EN, DE, FR, ES, PT

Ziggma

English-only (typically)

Open verdict cache

invest-like

Yes: every prompt versioned

Ziggma

Proprietary / opaque

Función	invest-like	Ziggma
Investor frameworks	7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)	Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock	Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning	No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A	Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)	None
Multi-investor debate	Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate	None
Stock universe	21,000+ US-focused	Major US and European-listed stocks
Cheapest paid tier	€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)	Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo
Lifetime option	€399 one-time (Founders)	No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI	EN, DE, FR, ES, PT	English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache	Yes: every prompt versioned	Proprietary / opaque

Elige Ziggma si…

Your portfolio is European-focused and Ziggma's regional coverage matters.
Portfolio risk + exposure analytics are your primary need.

Elige invest-like si…

You want named-investor framework grounding, not a proprietary score.
You want AI-grounded analysis (Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, Boardroom).
You need halal screening.
You want a methodology you can audit and cite.

Qué hace bien Ziggma

Strong portfolio analytics with risk and exposure breakdowns.
European market coverage edges US-focused competitors.
Clean mobile experience.

Dónde invest-like es más fuerte

Seven explicit named investor frameworks per stock vs Ziggma's proprietary opaque score.
Buffett Brain 5-pillar AI verdict with written reasoning, Ziggma's score is a number without per-pillar reasoning shown.
Ask Buffett RAG + Boardroom, no equivalent.
Halal Mode (AAOIFI Standard 21), no halal screen.
Published 5-year backtest with locked entry timestamps, Ziggma does not publish backtest of its scoring algorithm.
Working papers backing the methodology, Ziggma does not publish a methodology document.

De qué se quejan realmente los usuarios de Ziggma

Patrones recurrentes de reseñas públicas en Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 y AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Parafraseados, no citas directas.

Proprietary scoring methodology not fully documented, users can't audit the formula.
Coverage outside large-cap European and US-listed names is thin.
Mobile app polish exceeds the desktop experience.

Los listamos honestamente porque construimos invest-like específicamente para evitar cada uno: veredictos por inversor estructurados (sin puntuación opaca), razonamiento Buffett Brain escrito (sin conclusiones enterradas), metodología publicada, y precios para individuos, no instituciones.

Preguntas frecuentes

Is invest-like a Ziggma alternative?+

For stock-pick research, yes. Ziggma surfaces a proprietary score per stock plus portfolio analytics; invest-like scores every stock against seven named investor frameworks with written reasoning. For users who want transparent methodology over a proprietary black-box score, invest-like is the alternative.

Is Ziggma's score worth trusting?+

It's a proprietary aggregate that combines value, growth, dividend, momentum, and quality factors. The methodology isn't fully documented publicly so users have to accept the score on the brand's authority. invest-like publishes the rubric, the deal-breaker caps, and the per-pillar reasoning so any score is traceable.

Does Ziggma have AI features?+

No structured LLM-grounded verdict per stock. invest-like ships Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, and Boardroom.

How does pricing compare?+

Ziggma Premium is ~$9/mo. invest-like Pro is EUR 15/mo (EUR 12/mo annual equivalent). Comparable at entry.

Prueba invest-like en menos de 30 segundos

Ve el veredicto Buffett en Apple, NVIDIA o cualquiera de 21.000+ acciones.

Ver el veredicto de Apple Explorar los 7 frameworks

Otras comparativas

invest-like vs

Simply Wall St