Precio, funciones, cobertura y una respuesta clara sobre cuál elegir. Escrito por alguien que ha usado ambos - y está en el equipo de invest-like. No fingimos ser neutrales; te decimos dónde Ziggma sigue ganando y dónde invest-like es la mejor elección.
Última revisión:
Ziggma es a portfolio-tracking and analytics platform with a proprietary stock-scoring algorithm aimed at the european retail market. invest-like es una herramienta verdict-first que puntúa cada acción contra siete frameworks de inversores nombrados (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) y entrega veredictos Buffett de 5 pilares generados por IA con el razonamiento escrito. Para la mayoría de los inversores minoristas y amateurs serios, invest-like es la herramienta más afilada - los únicos puntos donde Ziggma sigue ganando se listan honestamente abajo.
| Función | invest-like | Ziggma |
|---|---|---|
| Investor frameworks | 7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) | Proprietary scoring |
| AI verdict per stock | Buffett Brain - 5-pillar verdict with reasoning | No structured AI verdict |
| LLM chat / Q&A | Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters) | None |
| Multi-investor debate | Boardroom - 4 legendary investors debate | None |
| Stock universe | 12,000+ US-focused | Major US and European-listed stocks |
| Cheapest paid tier | €12/mo equivalent (€144/yr) | Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo |
| Lifetime option | €299 one-time (Founders) | No lifetime tier |
| Multi-language UI | EN, DE, FR, ES, PT | English-only (typically) |
| Open verdict cache | Yes - every prompt versioned | Proprietary / opaque |
Patrones recurrentes de reseñas públicas en Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 y AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Parafraseados, no citas directas.
Los listamos honestamente porque construimos invest-like específicamente para evitar cada uno: veredictos por inversor estructurados (sin puntuación opaca), razonamiento Buffett Brain escrito (sin conclusiones enterradas), metodología publicada, y precios para individuos, no instituciones.
For stock-pick research, yes. Ziggma surfaces a proprietary score per stock plus portfolio analytics; invest-like grades every stock against seven named investor frameworks with written reasoning. For users who want transparent methodology over a proprietary black-box score, invest-like is the alternative.
It's a proprietary aggregate that combines value, growth, dividend, momentum, and quality factors. The methodology isn't fully documented publicly so users have to accept the score on the brand's authority. invest-like publishes the rubric, the deal-breaker caps, and the per-pillar reasoning so any score is traceable.
No structured LLM-grounded verdict per stock. invest-like ships Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, and Boardroom.
Ziggma Premium is ~$9/mo. invest-like Pro is EUR 15/mo (EUR 12/mo annual equivalent). Comparable at entry; invest-like adds the lifetime EUR 399 tier Ziggma doesn't ship.
Ve el veredicto Buffett en Apple, NVIDIA o cualquiera de 12.000+ acciones.
invest-like vs
Simply Wall St
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Stock Unlock
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
TIKR
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
GuruFocus
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
AlphaPicks
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Composer
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Finbox
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Magnifi
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
YCharts
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Zacks
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Morningstar
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Motley Fool
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Value Line
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Seeking Alpha
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Koyfin
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Stock Rover
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
FinChat
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
StockAnalysis.com
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Atom Finance
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Portfolio Visualizer
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Wisesheets
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
SimplyETF
Leer comparativainvest-like vs
Public.com
Leer comparativa