Stock comparison
Analog Devices
Applied Materials
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ADI
Analog Devices
Market cap
$203.82B
Sector
Technology
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$346.51B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ADI | AMAT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 61D | 76B | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 78B | 87A | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 71C | 66B | ADI |
| Peter Lynch | 63C | 65B | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 47D | 66C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 61D | 75B | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 61D | 71B | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ADI | AMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $203.82B | $346.51B |
| P/E (TTM) | 75.4x | 40.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 71.5x | 41.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 6.4% | 21.6% |
| Gross margin | 62.84% | 48.96% |
| Net margin | 23.02% | 29.31% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 10.77% | 5.31% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.01% | 7.72% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.42% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ADI leads on
- Dividend yield0.97%vs 0.42%+57%
- Revenue CAGR 5y10.77%vs 5.31%+51%
- Gross margin62.84%vs 48.96%+22%
AMAT leads on
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 6.4%+70%
- P/E (TTM)40.7xvs 75.4x+46%
- EV/EBIT41.8xvs 71.5x+41%
- Market cap$346.51Bvs $203.82B+41%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.