Which is better, COP or USAC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) currently grades higher than COP — 69/100 (C grade) vs 52/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — COP wins on none; USAC wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy COP or USAC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both COP and USAC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is COP better than USAC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, USAC currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 52/100, a 17-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between COP and USAC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). COP currently scores 52/100 (C grade); USAC scores 69/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, COP or USAC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. COP and USAC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, COP or USAC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are COP and USAC both Energy stocks?

Yes — both ConocoPhillips (COP) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this COP vs USAC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

ConocoPhillips

COP$146.76BEnergy Market cap, Sector

USA Compression Partners, LP

USAC$3.51BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

USA Compression Partners, LP

COP 07 USAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

COP0wins

7winsUSAC

Warren Buffett

52D

C69

Benjamin Graham

54D

B84

Philip Fisher

30F

C61

Peter Lynch

50D

B71

Joel Greenblatt

25F

F35

Charlie Munger

40F

C68

Terry Smith

40F

C64

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	COP	USAC
Market cap	Winner: $146.76B	$3.51B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 20.5x	32.8x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 14.5x	20.6x
ROIC (TTM)	6.08%	8.89% Winner
Gross margin	29.18%	51.61% Winner
Net margin	Winner: 12.56%	11.91%
Revenue CAGR 5y	6.26%	12.07% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	1.05%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.4x	9.5x
Dividend yield	2.7%	7.08% Winner

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

COP leads on

Market cap$146.76Bvs $3.51B+98%
Debt / Equity0.4xvs 9.5x+96%
P/E (TTM)20.5xvs 32.8x+38%
EV/EBIT14.5xvs 20.6x+30%

USAC leads on

Dividend yield7.08%vs 2.7%+62%
Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs 6.26%+48%
Gross margin51.61%vs 29.18%+43%
ROIC (TTM)8.89%vs 6.08%+32%

More like COP

COP vs TPL COP vs VAR.OL COP vs RATI.TA COP vs GTT.PA

More like USAC

USAC vs TPL USAC vs VAR.OL USAC vs RATI.TA USAC vs GTT.PA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for COP Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for USAC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

ConocoPhillips

COP$146.76BEnergy Market cap, Sector

USA Compression Partners, LP

USAC$3.51BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

USA Compression Partners, LP

COP 07 USAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

COP0wins

7winsUSAC

Warren Buffett

52D

C69

Benjamin Graham

54D

B84

Philip Fisher

30F

C61

Peter Lynch

50D

B71

Joel Greenblatt

25F

F35

Charlie Munger

40F

C68

Terry Smith

40F

C64

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	COP	USAC
Market cap	Winner: $146.76B	$3.51B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 20.5x	32.8x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 14.5x	20.6x
ROIC (TTM)	6.08%	8.89% Winner
Gross margin	29.18%	51.61% Winner
Net margin	Winner: 12.56%	11.91%
Revenue CAGR 5y	6.26%	12.07% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	1.05%	-
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.4x	9.5x
Dividend yield	2.7%	7.08% Winner

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

COP leads on

Market cap$146.76Bvs $3.51B+98%
Debt / Equity0.4xvs 9.5x+96%
P/E (TTM)20.5xvs 32.8x+38%
EV/EBIT14.5xvs 20.6x+30%

USAC leads on

Dividend yield7.08%vs 2.7%+62%
Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs 6.26%+48%
Gross margin51.61%vs 29.18%+43%
ROIC (TTM)8.89%vs 6.08%+32%

More like COP

COP vs TPL COP vs VAR.OL COP vs RATI.TA COP vs GTT.PA

More like USAC

USAC vs TPL USAC vs VAR.OL USAC vs RATI.TA USAC vs GTT.PA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for COP Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for USAC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.