Stock comparison
Gold Fields Limited
The Sherwin-Williams
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
Market cap
$35.38B
Sector
Materials
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams
Market cap
$76.23B
Sector
Materials
Overall winner
Gold Fields Limited GFI
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | GFI | SHW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 72B | 59C | GFI |
| Benjamin Graham | 65B | 81A | SHW |
| Philip Fisher | 78B | 54C | GFI |
| Peter Lynch | 64C | 68B | SHW |
| Joel Greenblatt | 47D | 47D | Tie |
| Charlie Munger | 72B | 62C | GFI |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 55D | GFI |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | GFI | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $35.38B | $76.23B |
| P/E (TTM) | 9.8x | 28.4x |
| EV/EBIT | 8.8x | 23.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 24.32% | 13.74% |
| Gross margin | 59.03% | 49.12% |
| Net margin | 40.95% | 10.86% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.27% | 4.27% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 44.4% | 9.96% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 3.1x |
| Dividend yield | 4.46% | 1.06% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
GFI leads on
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 3.1x+86%
- Revenue CAGR 5y20.27%vs 4.27%+79%
- EPS CAGR 5y44.4%vs 9.96%+78%
- Dividend yield4.46%vs 1.06%+76%
SHW leads on
- Market cap$76.23Bvs $35.38B+54%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.