invest-like vs Finbox
Preços, funcionalidades, cobertura e uma resposta clara sobre qual escolher. Escrito por alguém que realmente usou os dois, e faz parte da equipe invest-like. Não fingimos ser neutros; dizemos onde Finbox ainda vence e onde invest-like é a melhor escolha.
Última revisão:
Finbox é a quant-style stock screener with 100+ factor models, backtesting, and pre-built value/quality composites. invest-like é uma ferramenta verdict-first que pontua cada ação contra sete frameworks de investidores nomeados (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) e entrega veredictos Buffett de 5 pilares gerados por IA com o raciocínio escrito. Para a maioria dos investidores de varejo e amadores sérios, invest-like é a ferramenta mais afiada: os únicos pontos onde Finbox ainda vence estão listados honestamente abaixo.
invest-like é a única ferramenta aqui que publica a precisão dos seus veredictos. O screen de consenso de 7 frameworks rende +73.8% vs o S&P 500 em cinco anos, cada escolha registada publicamente, com o horário de entrada fixado.
Ver o track record publicadoComparação de funcionalidades
Investor frameworks
invest-like
7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)
Finbox
Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock
invest-like
Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning
Finbox
No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A
invest-like
Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)
Finbox
None
Multi-investor debate
invest-like
Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate
Finbox
None
Stock universe
invest-like
21,000+ US-focused
Finbox
Most global stocks (US-heavy, with international coverage)
Cheapest paid tier
invest-like
€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)
Finbox
$19-79/mo depending on tier; backtesting requires higher tier
Lifetime option
invest-like
€399 one-time (Founders)
Finbox
No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI
invest-like
EN, DE, FR, ES, PT
Finbox
English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache
invest-like
Yes: every prompt versioned
Finbox
Proprietary / opaque
| Funcionalidade | invest-like | Finbox |
|---|---|---|
| Investor frameworks | 7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) | Proprietary scoring |
| AI verdict per stock | Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning | No structured AI verdict |
| LLM chat / Q&A | Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters) | None |
| Multi-investor debate | Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate | None |
| Stock universe | 21,000+ US-focused | Most global stocks (US-heavy, with international coverage) |
| Cheapest paid tier | €12/mo equivalent (€144/yr) | $19-79/mo depending on tier; backtesting requires higher tier |
| Lifetime option | €399 one-time (Founders) | No lifetime tier |
| Multi-language UI | EN, DE, FR, ES, PT | English-only (typically) |
| Open verdict cache | Yes: every prompt versioned | Proprietary / opaque |
Escolha Finbox se…
- You actively run pre-built quant factors (Magic Formula, Piotroski F-Score, value composite) and that is how you select stocks.
- You backtest factor strategies regularly and need the 100-factor library specifically for systematic investing.
Escolha invest-like se…
- You want a plain-English verdict per investor framework instead of assembling factor screens yourself.
- You want AI-grounded analysis: Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, Boardroom. Finbox has none.
- You need halal screening (AAOIFI Standard 21).
- You are price-sensitive, invest-like Pro is EUR 144/yr vs Finbox Pro tier roughly twice that price.
O que Finbox faz bem
- 100+ pre-built quant factors (Magic Formula, Piotroski F-Score, value composites) ready to screen with.
- Solid factor backtesting against historical data on the higher tiers, useful for systematic investors.
- Strong global coverage if you screen international names regularly.
Onde invest-like é mais forte
- Seven named investor-framework verdicts per stock with structured reasoning, Finbox surfaces the underlying factors, but invest-like ships the framework verdict on top.
- Buffett Brain 5-pillar AI verdict per stock with the reasoning written out in plain English. Finbox has factor scores, not narrative reasoning.
- Ask Buffett RAG against real Berkshire shareholder letters, no Finbox equivalent.
- Boardroom 4-investor debate per stock with skeptic, unique to invest-like.
- Halal Mode (AAOIFI Standard 21) on every ticker, Finbox has no religious-compliance screen.
- EUR 144/yr (EUR 12/mo equivalent) vs Finbox $19-79/mo, cheaper at the entry tier.
- Plain-English UX vs Finbox quant-factor surface area, faster for users who want a judgment call rather than to assemble factor screens themselves.
Sobre o que os usuários de Finbox realmente reclamam
Padrões recorrentes de avaliações públicas no Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 e AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Parafraseados, não citações diretas.
- 100-factor library is powerful but heavy, users without quant background report a steep onboarding curve.
- Backtesting requires higher tiers: the cheapest plan delivers screening but the historical-test feature most reviewers cite is paywalled higher up.
- No narrative analysis or AI verdict, users do all qualitative interpretation themselves from raw factor scores.
Listamos isso honestamente porque construímos o invest-like especificamente para evitar cada um: veredictos por investidor estruturados (sem pontuação opaca), raciocínio Buffett Brain escrito (sem conclusões escondidas), metodologia publicada, e preços para indivíduos, não instituições.
Perguntas frequentes
Is invest-like a better choice than Finbox?+
For value investors who want framework-grounded verdicts, yes. Finbox is a quant factor screener: it surfaces underlying ratios and lets you screen with them. invest-like sits the verdict layer on top: seven named investor frameworks scored per stock, plus Buffett Brain AI verdict with reasoning. If you actively backtest factor strategies, Finbox remains the right pick. If you want a verdict-first tool, invest-like is the alternative.
Does Finbox have AI features?+
No. Finbox is classical quant, factor scores, backtesting, screening. invest-like ships three AI-native features Finbox doesn't: Buffett Brain (5-pillar AI verdict), Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters), and Boardroom (4-investor debate).
Can I use both: Finbox for screening, invest-like for per-stock verdicts?+
Yes. The natural division: Finbox screens the universe down to a shortlist using quant factors, then invest-like delivers the per-stock framework verdict on each name. Most invest-like users find the strategy screener built into the consensus page covers most of the screening need, but stacking the two is reasonable for hardcore quant + value workflows.
What about halal investing?+
invest-like is the only platform between the two with an integrated AAOIFI Standard 21 halal screen. Finbox doesn't ship religious-compliance screening as a first-class feature.
Experimente o invest-like em menos de 30 segundos
Veja o veredito Buffett sobre Apple, NVIDIA ou qualquer uma das 21.000+ ações.
Outras comparações
invest-like vs
Simply Wall St
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Stock Unlock
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
TIKR
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
GuruFocus
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
AlphaPicks
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Composer
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Magnifi
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
YCharts
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Zacks
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Morningstar
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Motley Fool
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Value Line
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Seeking Alpha
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Koyfin
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Stock Rover
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Fiscal.ai (formerly FinChat)
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
StockAnalysis.com
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Atom Finance
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Portfolio Visualizer
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Ziggma
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Wisesheets
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
SimplyETF
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Public.com
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
TipRanks
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Danelfin
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Stockopedia
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
Finviz
Ler comparaçãoinvest-like vs
WallStreetZen
Ler comparação