Comparação · 2026

invest-like vs Ziggma

Preços, funcionalidades, cobertura e uma resposta clara sobre qual escolher. Escrito por alguém que realmente usou os dois - e faz parte da equipe invest-like. Não fingimos ser neutros; dizemos onde Ziggma ainda vence e onde invest-like é a melhor escolha.

Última revisão: 16 de maio de 2026

Veredito rápido

Ziggma é a portfolio-tracking and analytics platform with a proprietary stock-scoring algorithm aimed at the european retail market. invest-like é uma ferramenta verdict-first que pontua cada ação contra sete frameworks de investidores nomeados (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) e entrega veredictos Buffett de 5 pilares gerados por IA com o raciocínio escrito. Para a maioria dos investidores de varejo e amadores sérios, invest-like é a ferramenta mais afiada - os únicos pontos onde Ziggma ainda vence estão listados honestamente abaixo.

Track record

invest-like é a única ferramenta aqui que publica a precisão dos seus veredictos. O screen de consenso de 7 frameworks rende +73.8% vs o S&P 500 em cinco anos - cada escolha registada publicamente, com o horário de entrada fixado.

Ver o track record publicado

Comparação de funcionalidades

Investor frameworks

invest-like

7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)

Ziggma

Proprietary scoring

AI verdict per stock

invest-like

Buffett Brain - 5-pillar verdict with reasoning

Ziggma

No structured AI verdict

LLM chat / Q&A

invest-like

Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)

Ziggma

None

Multi-investor debate

invest-like

Boardroom - 4 legendary investors debate

Ziggma

None

Stock universe

invest-like

12,000+ US-focused

Ziggma

Major US and European-listed stocks

Cheapest paid tier

invest-like

€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)

Ziggma

Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo

Lifetime option

invest-like

€299 one-time (Founders)

Ziggma

No lifetime tier

Multi-language UI

invest-like

EN, DE, FR, ES, PT

Ziggma

English-only (typically)

Open verdict cache

invest-like

Yes - every prompt versioned

Ziggma

Proprietary / opaque

Funcionalidade	invest-like	Ziggma
Investor frameworks	7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)	Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock	Buffett Brain - 5-pillar verdict with reasoning	No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A	Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)	None
Multi-investor debate	Boardroom - 4 legendary investors debate	None
Stock universe	12,000+ US-focused	Major US and European-listed stocks
Cheapest paid tier	€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)	Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo
Lifetime option	€299 one-time (Founders)	No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI	EN, DE, FR, ES, PT	English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache	Yes - every prompt versioned	Proprietary / opaque

Escolha Ziggma se…

Your portfolio is European-focused and Ziggma's regional coverage matters.
Portfolio risk + exposure analytics are your primary need.

Escolha invest-like se…

You want named-investor framework grounding, not a proprietary score.
You want AI-grounded analysis (Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, Boardroom).
You need halal screening.
You want a methodology you can audit and cite.

O que Ziggma faz bem

Strong portfolio analytics with risk and exposure breakdowns.
European market coverage edges US-focused competitors.
Clean mobile experience.

Onde invest-like é mais forte

Seven explicit named investor frameworks per stock vs Ziggma's proprietary opaque score.
Buffett Brain 5-pillar AI verdict with written reasoning - Ziggma's score is a number without per-pillar reasoning shown.
Ask Buffett RAG + Boardroom - no equivalent.
Halal Mode (AAOIFI Standard 21) - no halal screen.
Published 5-year backtest with locked entry timestamps - Ziggma does not publish backtest of its scoring algorithm.
Working papers backing the methodology - Ziggma does not publish a methodology document.

Sobre o que os usuários de Ziggma realmente reclamam

Padrões recorrentes de avaliações públicas no Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 e AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Parafraseados, não citações diretas.

Proprietary scoring methodology not fully documented - users can't audit the formula.
Coverage outside large-cap European and US-listed names is thin.
Mobile app polish exceeds the desktop experience.

Listamos isso honestamente porque construímos o invest-like especificamente para evitar cada um: veredictos por investidor estruturados (sem pontuação opaca), raciocínio Buffett Brain escrito (sem conclusões escondidas), metodologia publicada, e preços para indivíduos, não instituições.

Perguntas frequentes

Is invest-like a Ziggma alternative?+

For stock-pick research, yes. Ziggma surfaces a proprietary score per stock plus portfolio analytics; invest-like grades every stock against seven named investor frameworks with written reasoning. For users who want transparent methodology over a proprietary black-box score, invest-like is the alternative.

Is Ziggma's score worth trusting?+

It's a proprietary aggregate that combines value, growth, dividend, momentum, and quality factors. The methodology isn't fully documented publicly so users have to accept the score on the brand's authority. invest-like publishes the rubric, the deal-breaker caps, and the per-pillar reasoning so any score is traceable.

Does Ziggma have AI features?+

No structured LLM-grounded verdict per stock. invest-like ships Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, and Boardroom.

How does pricing compare?+

Ziggma Premium is ~$9/mo. invest-like Pro is EUR 15/mo (EUR 12/mo annual equivalent). Comparable at entry; invest-like adds the lifetime EUR 399 tier Ziggma doesn't ship.

Experimente o invest-like em menos de 30 segundos

Veja o veredito Buffett sobre Apple, NVIDIA ou qualquer uma das 12.000+ ações.

Ver o veredito da Apple Explorar os 7 frameworks

Outras comparações

invest-like vs

Simply Wall St