Stock comparison
Applied Materials
ASML Holding N.V.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
Market cap
$629.35B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
ASML Holding N.V. ASML
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | ASML | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 68B | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 80A | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 80A | ASML |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 76B | ASML |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 77C | ASML |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 84A | ASML |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 91A | ASML |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $629.35B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 51.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 45.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 34.9% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 52.6% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 29.71% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 15.1% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 13.37% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.56% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- P/E (TTM)40.0xvs 51.8x+23%
- EV/EBIT41.0xvs 45.4x+10%
ASML leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.1%vs 5.31%+65%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.3x+52%
- Market cap$629.35Bvs $343.12B+45%
- EPS CAGR 5y13.37%vs 7.72%+42%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.