Which is better, CHRW or NSSC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) currently grades higher than CHRW — 70/100 (B grade) vs 48/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CHRW wins on none; NSSC wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CHRW or NSSC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CHRW and NSSC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CHRW better than NSSC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, NSSC currently grades higher — 70/100 vs 48/100, a 22-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CHRW and NSSC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CHRW currently scores 48/100 (D grade); NSSC scores 70/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CHRW or NSSC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CHRW and NSSC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CHRW or NSSC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CHRW and NSSC both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CHRW vs NSSC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

C.H. Robinson Worldwide

Napco Security Technologies

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CHRW

Market cap

$20.54B

Sector

Industrials

NSSC

Napco Security Technologies

Market cap

$1.34B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Napco Security Technologies NSSC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CHRW	NSSC	Winner
Warren Buffett	48D	70B	NSSC
Benjamin Graham	77B	90A	NSSC
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CHRW	NSSC
Market cap	$20.54B	$1.34B
P/E (TTM)	34.0x	38.9x
EV/EBIT	27.1x	28.7x
ROIC (TTM)	19.04%	18.36%
Gross margin	8.29%	56.97%
Net margin	3.7%	18.7%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-8.44%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CHRW leads on

Market cap$20.54Bvs $1.34B+93%
P/E (TTM)34.0xvs 38.9x+13%
EV/EBIT27.1xvs 28.7x+6%

NSSC leads on

More like CHRW

CHRW vs PAYX CHRW vs LII CHRW vs GGG CHRW vs WTS CHRW vs OMAB CHRW vs FAST

More like NSSC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.