Which is better, FTI or GTT.PA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GTT.PA) currently grades higher than FTI — 72/100 (B grade) vs 45/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — FTI wins on none; GTT.PA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy FTI or GTT.PA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both FTI and GTT.PA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is FTI better than GTT.PA for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GTT.PA currently grades higher — 72/100 vs 45/100, a 27-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between FTI and GTT.PA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). FTI currently scores 45/100 (D grade); GTT.PA scores 72/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, FTI or GTT.PA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. FTI and GTT.PA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, FTI or GTT.PA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are FTI and GTT.PA both Energy stocks?

Yes — both TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GTT.PA) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this FTI vs GTT.PA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

TechnipFMC

FTI$29.75BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

GTT.PA$7.03BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

FTI 07 GTT.PA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

FTI0wins

7winsGTT.PA

Warren Buffett

45D

B72

Benjamin Graham

49D

B70

Philip Fisher

46D

B84

Peter Lynch

47D

C66

Joel Greenblatt

61C

B72

Charlie Munger

36F

B83

Terry Smith

40F

A88

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FTI	GTT.PA
Market cap	Winner: $29.75B	$7.03B
P/E (TTM)	26.9x	18.0x Winner
EV/EBIT	30.7x	13.8x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	21.08%	54.72% Winner
Gross margin	22.44%	94.91% Winner
Net margin	10.63%	51.51% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	11.6%	37.74% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 86.53%	47.56%
Debt / Equity	0.4x	0.2x Winner
Dividend yield	0.27%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FTI leads on

Market cap$29.75Bvs $7.03B+76%
EPS CAGR 5y86.53%vs 47.56%+45%

GTT.PA leads on

Net margin51.51%vs 10.63%+79%
Gross margin94.91%vs 22.44%+76%
Revenue CAGR 5y37.74%vs 11.6%+69%
ROIC (TTM)54.72%vs 21.08%+61%

More like FTI

FTI vs TPL FTI vs VAR.OL FTI vs RATI.TA FTI vs USAC

More like GTT.PA

GTT.PA vs TPL GTT.PA vs VAR.OL GTT.PA vs RATI.TA GTT.PA vs USAC

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for FTI Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GTT.PA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

TechnipFMC

FTI$29.75BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

GTT.PA$7.03BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

FTI 07 GTT.PA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

FTI0wins

7winsGTT.PA

Warren Buffett

45D

B72

Benjamin Graham

49D

B70

Philip Fisher

46D

B84

Peter Lynch

47D

C66

Joel Greenblatt

61C

B72

Charlie Munger

36F

B83

Terry Smith

40F

A88

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FTI	GTT.PA
Market cap	Winner: $29.75B	$7.03B
P/E (TTM)	26.9x	18.0x Winner
EV/EBIT	30.7x	13.8x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	21.08%	54.72% Winner
Gross margin	22.44%	94.91% Winner
Net margin	10.63%	51.51% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	11.6%	37.74% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 86.53%	47.56%
Debt / Equity	0.4x	0.2x Winner
Dividend yield	0.27%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FTI leads on

Market cap$29.75Bvs $7.03B+76%
EPS CAGR 5y86.53%vs 47.56%+45%

GTT.PA leads on

Net margin51.51%vs 10.63%+79%
Gross margin94.91%vs 22.44%+76%
Revenue CAGR 5y37.74%vs 11.6%+69%
ROIC (TTM)54.72%vs 21.08%+61%

More like FTI

FTI vs TPL FTI vs VAR.OL FTI vs RATI.TA FTI vs USAC

More like GTT.PA

GTT.PA vs TPL GTT.PA vs VAR.OL GTT.PA vs RATI.TA GTT.PA vs USAC

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for FTI Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GTT.PA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.