Stock comparison
Applied Materials
ASE Technology
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
ASX
ASE Technology
Market cap
$76.37B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | ASX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 31F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 73B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 25F | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 14F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 44D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 29F | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 17F | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | ASX |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $76.37B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 50.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 50.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 6.64% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 18.51% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 7.04% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 3.55% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | -10.86% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.7x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.97% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs -10.86%+171%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $76.37B+78%
- Net margin29.31%vs 7.04%+76%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 6.64%+69%
ASX leads on
- Dividend yield0.97%vs 0.45%+54%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.