Which is better, DECK or GRGD.TO?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Groupe Dynamite Inc. (GRGD.TO) currently grades higher than DECK — 84/100 (A grade) vs 77/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — DECK wins on none; GRGD.TO wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy DECK or GRGD.TO?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both DECK and GRGD.TO are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is DECK better than GRGD.TO for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GRGD.TO currently grades higher — 84/100 vs 77/100, a 7-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between DECK and GRGD.TO on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). DECK currently scores 77/100 (B grade); GRGD.TO scores 84/100 (A grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, DECK or GRGD.TO?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. DECK and GRGD.TO are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, DECK or GRGD.TO?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are DECK and GRGD.TO both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Groupe Dynamite Inc. (GRGD.TO) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this DECK vs GRGD.TO comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Deckers Outdoor

DECK$14.39BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Groupe Dynamite

GRGD.TO$5.74BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Groupe Dynamite

DECK 07 GRGD.TO

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

DECK0wins

7winsGRGD.TO

Warren Buffett

77B

B84

Benjamin Graham

72B

A85

Philip Fisher

77B

A92

Peter Lynch

61C

B74

Joel Greenblatt

52D

B79

Charlie Munger

76B

A92

Terry Smith

83B

A90

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	DECK	GRGD.TO
Market cap	Winner: $14.39B	$5.74B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.2x	29.6x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.8x	20.6x
ROIC (TTM)	32.7%	49.19% Winner
Gross margin	57.54%	63.85% Winner
Net margin	Winner: 19.35%	19.25%
Revenue CAGR 5y	18.3%	23.39% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	29.38%	55.64% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.1x	5.1x
Dividend yield	0.0%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

DECK leads on

Debt / Equity0.1xvs 5.1x+97%
Market cap$14.39Bvs $5.74B+60%
P/E (TTM)13.2xvs 29.6x+55%
EV/EBIT9.8xvs 20.6x+52%

GRGD.TO leads on

EPS CAGR 5y55.64%vs 29.38%+47%
ROIC (TTM)49.19%vs 32.7%+34%
Revenue CAGR 5y23.39%vs 18.3%+22%
Gross margin63.85%vs 57.54%+10%

More like DECK

DECK vs GAW.L DECK vs WINA DECK vs RMS.PA DECK vs 2059.TW

More like GRGD.TO

GRGD.TO vs GAW.L GRGD.TO vs WINA GRGD.TO vs RMS.PA GRGD.TO vs 2059.TW

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for DECK Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GRGD.TO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Deckers Outdoor

DECK$14.39BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Groupe Dynamite

GRGD.TO$5.74BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Groupe Dynamite

DECK 07 GRGD.TO

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

DECK0wins

7winsGRGD.TO

Warren Buffett

77B

B84

Benjamin Graham

72B

A85

Philip Fisher

77B

A92

Peter Lynch

61C

B74

Joel Greenblatt

52D

B79

Charlie Munger

76B

A92

Terry Smith

83B

A90

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	DECK	GRGD.TO
Market cap	Winner: $14.39B	$5.74B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.2x	29.6x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.8x	20.6x
ROIC (TTM)	32.7%	49.19% Winner
Gross margin	57.54%	63.85% Winner
Net margin	Winner: 19.35%	19.25%
Revenue CAGR 5y	18.3%	23.39% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	29.38%	55.64% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.1x	5.1x
Dividend yield	0.0%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

DECK leads on

Debt / Equity0.1xvs 5.1x+97%
Market cap$14.39Bvs $5.74B+60%
P/E (TTM)13.2xvs 29.6x+55%
EV/EBIT9.8xvs 20.6x+52%

GRGD.TO leads on

EPS CAGR 5y55.64%vs 29.38%+47%
ROIC (TTM)49.19%vs 32.7%+34%
Revenue CAGR 5y23.39%vs 18.3%+22%
Gross margin63.85%vs 57.54%+10%

More like DECK

DECK vs GAW.L DECK vs WINA DECK vs RMS.PA DECK vs 2059.TW

More like GRGD.TO

GRGD.TO vs GAW.L GRGD.TO vs WINA GRGD.TO vs RMS.PA GRGD.TO vs 2059.TW

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for DECK Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GRGD.TO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.