invest-like vs GuruFocus
Preise, Features, Abdeckung und eine klare Antwort, welches Tool Du wählen solltest. Geschrieben von jemandem, der beide tatsächlich genutzt hat, und im invest-like-Team ist. Wir geben uns nicht neutral; wir sagen Dir, wo GuruFocus noch gewinnt und wo invest-like die bessere Wahl ist.
Zuletzt geprüft:
GuruFocus ist a long-running value-investing data warehouse known for its 'guru' holdings tracker and dense ratio library. invest-like ist ein verdikt-orientiertes Tool, das jede Aktie gegen sieben benannte Investor-Frameworks bewertet (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) und KI-generierte 5-Säulen-Buffett-Analysen mit ausgeschriebenem Reasoning ausliefert. Für die meisten Retail- und ambitionierten Amateur-Value-Investoren ist invest-like das schärfere Tool: die Stellen, an denen GuruFocus noch gewinnt, listen wir ehrlich unten auf.
invest-like ist das einzige Tool hier, das seine Analyse-Treffer offenlegt. Der 7-Framework-Consensus-Screen liegt +73.8% vs. S&P 500 über fünf Jahre, jeder Pick öffentlich dokumentiert, mit fixierten Einstiegszeitpunkten.
Track Record ansehenFeature-Vergleich
Investor frameworks
invest-like
7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)
GuruFocus
Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock
invest-like
Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning
GuruFocus
No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A
invest-like
Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)
GuruFocus
None
Multi-investor debate
invest-like
Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate
GuruFocus
None
Stock universe
invest-like
21,000+ US-focused
GuruFocus
100,000+ stocks across 100+ markets
Cheapest paid tier
invest-like
€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)
GuruFocus
From $40/mo (billed annually) for Premium; lower tiers exist with significant feature gaps
Lifetime option
invest-like
€399 one-time (Founders)
GuruFocus
No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI
invest-like
EN, DE, FR, ES, PT
GuruFocus
English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache
invest-like
Yes: every prompt versioned
GuruFocus
Proprietary / opaque
| Feature | invest-like | GuruFocus |
|---|---|---|
| Investor frameworks | 7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) | Proprietary scoring |
| AI verdict per stock | Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning | No structured AI verdict |
| LLM chat / Q&A | Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters) | None |
| Multi-investor debate | Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate | None |
| Stock universe | 21,000+ US-focused | 100,000+ stocks across 100+ markets |
| Cheapest paid tier | €12/mo equivalent (€144/yr) | From $40/mo (billed annually) for Premium; lower tiers exist with significant feature gaps |
| Lifetime option | €399 one-time (Founders) | No lifetime tier |
| Multi-language UI | EN, DE, FR, ES, PT | English-only (typically) |
| Open verdict cache | Yes: every prompt versioned | Proprietary / opaque |
Wähl GuruFocus, wenn…
- Replicating named hedge-fund / guru portfolios is your primary workflow: the Guru tracker is GuruFocus strongest claim and we don't replicate it.
- You have been running Piotroski / Altman / Beneish screens for years and that is the lens through which you make decisions.
Wähl invest-like, wenn…
- You want a plain-English verdict per investor framework instead of a wall of ratios you have to interpret yourself.
- You want AI-grounded analysis (Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, Boardroom), GuruFocus has none.
- You want a tool that is fast to use, GuruFocus has a real onboarding cliff. invest-like is built for a 30-second verdict.
- You read or speak German, French, Spanish, or Portuguese.
- You want a published verdict-accuracy track record: we publish ours.
Was GuruFocus gut macht
- The 'Guru' holdings tracker, see what Buffett, Klarman, Burry, and 8,000+ named investors actually own and trade. Strongest single reason to use GuruFocus.
- Wider coverage (100,000+ stocks across global markets) than our 21,000+ - relevant if you trade micro-caps or obscure global names.
- A handful of niche academic screens (Altman Z-Score, Beneish M-Score, Sloan Accruals) we don't yet ship, useful if your workflow is built around those specific tests.
Wo invest-like stärker ist
- Seven named investor frameworks scored on every stock with structured pass/fail reasoning, vs. GuruFocus wall of ratios that you have to interpret yourself.
- Buffett Brain: AI-generated 5-pillar verdict with the reasoning written in plain English. GuruFocus has scores and screens but no narrative verdict.
- Ask Buffett: conversational RAG against Berkshire shareholder letters. GuruFocus has no LLM features at all.
- Boardroom: four investors debate any stock. Unique.
- Classical value-investing screens on every stock page, Graham Number, Net-Net, 5-point Quality (Piotroski-inspired), Margin of Safety vs DCF + analyst consensus. The headline screens GuruFocus is known for, included in the free tier.
- Sector-relative percentile rankings on ROIC, P/E, margin, growth, and owner-earnings yield, every stock pre-ranked against its sector peers.
- Approachable UX: GuruFocus is famously dense and overwhelming. invest-like is built for fast decisions.
- Roughly 1/3 the price: EUR 15/mo (EUR 12/mo annual), vs. GuruFocus Premium at $40/mo.
- Multi-language UI (EN, DE, FR, ES, PT), GuruFocus is English-only.
- Published verdict-accuracy track record. GuruFocus does not publish hit rates on its scores.
Worüber sich GuruFocus-Nutzer wirklich beschweren
Wiederkehrende Muster aus öffentlichen Reviews auf Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 und AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Paraphrasiert, keine direkten Zitate.
- The UI feels dated: dense, overwhelming, with no clear path through the ratio library for users who aren't already power users.
- Proprietary scores (Buffett-Munger Screen, 'Predictability Rank', 'GF Score') are calculated from documented inputs but the exact weightings aren't surfaced in plain English on each stock page, users have to dig to see why a stock got a 4 vs a 7.
- Premium pricing ($40/mo) reads as institutional, retail reviewers regularly describe the cost as steep for individuals not running other people money.
Wir listen das ehrlich auf, weil wir invest-like genau dafür gebaut haben, all das zu vermeiden: strukturierte Pro-Investor-Analysen (keine intransparente Bewertung), Buffett-Brain-Reasoning ausgeschrieben (keine versteckten Schlüsse), veröffentlichte Methodik und Preise für Privatpersonen, nicht Institutionen.
Häufige Fragen
Is invest-like a better choice than GuruFocus?+
For most investors, yes, and at roughly a third of the price. GuruFocus is a data warehouse with a famously steep onboarding cliff: massive ratio library, opaque scoring, no AI features. invest-like is purpose-built for a faster judgment loop: seven named investor frameworks, Buffett Brain verdict with reasoning, Ask Buffett chat against real Berkshire letters. The only category where GuruFocus still leads is the Guru holdings tracker, useful if your strategy is to replicate Buffett or Klarman portfolio directly.
Does GuruFocus have AI features like Buffett Brain?+
No. GuruFocus strength is ratios, screens, and insider/guru tracking, classical value-investing tooling. There is no LLM-generated verdict and no AI chat. invest-like ships three AI-native features GuruFocus does not: Buffett Brain (5-pillar AI verdict), Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters), and Boardroom (4-investor debate).
Why is GuruFocus so much more expensive?+
Legacy pricing. GuruFocus Premium has been $40/mo for years and prices around an institutional buyer profile. invest-like is priced for the indie retail and serious-amateur investor: EUR 15/mo or EUR 144/yr (EUR 12/mo equivalent). Roughly a third of GuruFocus Premium cost, and the value gap is on invest-like side for AI verdicts, named frameworks, and plain-English UX.
Can I use both?+
You can. Most of the classic ratios that justify the GuruFocus price (ROIC, F-Score-style quality metrics, debt ratios) already show up in the Buffett Brain reasoning, so the overlap is large. Keeping both mainly makes sense if you copy guru portfolios closely.
What about the 100,000+ stock coverage?+
GuruFocus covers 100,000+ vs. our 21,000+. For US large-cap and mid-cap watchlists (where most retail decisions are made), both have full coverage. The 100,000 number adds a long tail of micro-caps and obscure global tickers, useful if your portfolio is heavy on those names, irrelevant for most investors. We expand coverage continuously; we don't try to win on raw ticker count.
Probier invest-like in unter 30 Sekunden
Sieh Dir die Buffett-Analyse zu Apple, NVIDIA oder einer von 21.000+ Aktien an.
See also
Looking for a broader roundup of GuruFocus alternatives, not just the head-to-head? The dedicated GuruFocus alternatives page lists every value-investing tool we benchmarked against GuruFocus, with one-line summaries and price comparisons.
Andere Vergleiche
invest-like vs
Simply Wall St
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Stock Unlock
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
TIKR
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
AlphaPicks
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Composer
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Finbox
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Magnifi
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
YCharts
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Zacks
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Morningstar
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Motley Fool
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Value Line
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Seeking Alpha
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Koyfin
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Stock Rover
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Fiscal.ai (formerly FinChat)
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
StockAnalysis.com
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Atom Finance
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Portfolio Visualizer
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Ziggma
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Wisesheets
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
SimplyETF
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Public.com
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
TipRanks
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Danelfin
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Stockopedia
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Finviz
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
WallStreetZen
Vergleich lesen