Vergleich · 2026

invest-like vs Ziggma

Preise, Features, Abdeckung und eine klare Antwort, welches Tool Du wählen solltest. Geschrieben von jemandem, der beide tatsächlich genutzt hat, und im invest-like-Team ist. Wir geben uns nicht neutral; wir sagen Dir, wo Ziggma noch gewinnt und wo invest-like die bessere Wahl ist.

Zuletzt geprüft: 16. Mai 2026

Kurzfazit

Ziggma ist a portfolio-tracking and analytics platform with a proprietary stock-scoring algorithm aimed at the european retail market. invest-like ist ein verdikt-orientiertes Tool, das jede Aktie gegen sieben benannte Investor-Frameworks bewertet (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) und KI-generierte 5-Säulen-Buffett-Analysen mit ausgeschriebenem Reasoning ausliefert. Für die meisten Retail- und ambitionierten Amateur-Value-Investoren ist invest-like das schärfere Tool: die Stellen, an denen Ziggma noch gewinnt, listen wir ehrlich unten auf.

Track Record

invest-like ist das einzige Tool hier, das seine Analyse-Treffer offenlegt. Der 7-Framework-Consensus-Screen liegt +73.8% vs. S&P 500 über fünf Jahre, jeder Pick öffentlich dokumentiert, mit fixierten Einstiegszeitpunkten.

Track Record ansehen

Feature-Vergleich

Investor frameworks

invest-like

7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)

Ziggma

Proprietary scoring

AI verdict per stock

invest-like

Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning

Ziggma

No structured AI verdict

LLM chat / Q&A

invest-like

Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)

Ziggma

None

Multi-investor debate

invest-like

Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate

Ziggma

None

Stock universe

invest-like

21,000+ US-focused

Ziggma

Major US and European-listed stocks

Cheapest paid tier

invest-like

€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)

Ziggma

Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo

Lifetime option

invest-like

€399 one-time (Founders)

Ziggma

No lifetime tier

Multi-language UI

invest-like

EN, DE, FR, ES, PT

Ziggma

English-only (typically)

Open verdict cache

invest-like

Yes: every prompt versioned

Ziggma

Proprietary / opaque

Feature	invest-like	Ziggma
Investor frameworks	7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)	Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock	Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning	No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A	Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)	None
Multi-investor debate	Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate	None
Stock universe	21,000+ US-focused	Major US and European-listed stocks
Cheapest paid tier	€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)	Free tier limited; Premium ~$9/mo
Lifetime option	€399 one-time (Founders)	No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI	EN, DE, FR, ES, PT	English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache	Yes: every prompt versioned	Proprietary / opaque

Wähl Ziggma, wenn…

Your portfolio is European-focused and Ziggma's regional coverage matters.
Portfolio risk + exposure analytics are your primary need.

Wähl invest-like, wenn…

You want named-investor framework grounding, not a proprietary score.
You want AI-grounded analysis (Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, Boardroom).
You need halal screening.
You want a methodology you can audit and cite.

Was Ziggma gut macht

Strong portfolio analytics with risk and exposure breakdowns.
European market coverage edges US-focused competitors.
Clean mobile experience.

Wo invest-like stärker ist

Seven explicit named investor frameworks per stock vs Ziggma's proprietary opaque score.
Buffett Brain 5-pillar AI verdict with written reasoning, Ziggma's score is a number without per-pillar reasoning shown.
Ask Buffett RAG + Boardroom, no equivalent.
Halal Mode (AAOIFI Standard 21), no halal screen.
Published 5-year backtest with locked entry timestamps, Ziggma does not publish backtest of its scoring algorithm.
Working papers backing the methodology, Ziggma does not publish a methodology document.

Worüber sich Ziggma-Nutzer wirklich beschweren

Wiederkehrende Muster aus öffentlichen Reviews auf Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 und AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Paraphrasiert, keine direkten Zitate.

Proprietary scoring methodology not fully documented, users can't audit the formula.
Coverage outside large-cap European and US-listed names is thin.
Mobile app polish exceeds the desktop experience.

Wir listen das ehrlich auf, weil wir invest-like genau dafür gebaut haben, all das zu vermeiden: strukturierte Pro-Investor-Analysen (keine intransparente Bewertung), Buffett-Brain-Reasoning ausgeschrieben (keine versteckten Schlüsse), veröffentlichte Methodik und Preise für Privatpersonen, nicht Institutionen.

Häufige Fragen

Is invest-like a Ziggma alternative?+

For stock-pick research, yes. Ziggma surfaces a proprietary score per stock plus portfolio analytics; invest-like scores every stock against seven named investor frameworks with written reasoning. For users who want transparent methodology over a proprietary black-box score, invest-like is the alternative.

Is Ziggma's score worth trusting?+

It's a proprietary aggregate that combines value, growth, dividend, momentum, and quality factors. The methodology isn't fully documented publicly so users have to accept the score on the brand's authority. invest-like publishes the rubric, the deal-breaker caps, and the per-pillar reasoning so any score is traceable.

Does Ziggma have AI features?+

No structured LLM-grounded verdict per stock. invest-like ships Buffett Brain, Ask Buffett, and Boardroom.

How does pricing compare?+

Ziggma Premium is ~$9/mo. invest-like Pro is EUR 15/mo (EUR 12/mo annual equivalent). Comparable at entry.

Probier invest-like in unter 30 Sekunden

Sieh Dir die Buffett-Analyse zu Apple, NVIDIA oder einer von 21.000+ Aktien an.

Apple-Analyse ansehen Die 7 Frameworks ansehen

Andere Vergleiche

invest-like vs

Simply Wall St