invest-like vs Public.com
Preise, Features, Abdeckung und eine klare Antwort, welches Tool Du wählen solltest. Geschrieben von jemandem, der beide tatsächlich genutzt hat, und im invest-like-Team ist. Wir geben uns nicht neutral; wir sagen Dir, wo Public.com noch gewinnt und wo invest-like die bessere Wahl ist.
Zuletzt geprüft:
Public.com ist a us brokerage with built-in fractional shares, social investing features, and ai-assisted commentary on individual tickers. invest-like ist ein verdikt-orientiertes Tool, das jede Aktie gegen sieben benannte Investor-Frameworks bewertet (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) und KI-generierte 5-Säulen-Buffett-Analysen mit ausgeschriebenem Reasoning ausliefert. Für die meisten Retail- und ambitionierten Amateur-Value-Investoren ist invest-like das schärfere Tool: die Stellen, an denen Public.com noch gewinnt, listen wir ehrlich unten auf.
invest-like ist das einzige Tool hier, das seine Analyse-Treffer offenlegt. Der 7-Framework-Consensus-Screen liegt +73.8% vs. S&P 500 über fünf Jahre, jeder Pick öffentlich dokumentiert, mit fixierten Einstiegszeitpunkten.
Track Record ansehenFeature-Vergleich
Investor frameworks
invest-like
7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith)
Public.com
Proprietary scoring
AI verdict per stock
invest-like
Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning
Public.com
No structured AI verdict
LLM chat / Q&A
invest-like
Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters)
Public.com
None
Multi-investor debate
invest-like
Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate
Public.com
None
Stock universe
invest-like
21,000+ US-focused
Public.com
US-listed stocks, ETFs, crypto, treasuries, alternative assets
Cheapest paid tier
invest-like
€12/mo equivalent (€144/yr)
Public.com
Free brokerage; optional Public Premium ~$8/mo for advanced features
Lifetime option
invest-like
€399 one-time (Founders)
Public.com
No lifetime tier
Multi-language UI
invest-like
EN, DE, FR, ES, PT
Public.com
English-only (typically)
Open verdict cache
invest-like
Yes: every prompt versioned
Public.com
Proprietary / opaque
| Feature | invest-like | Public.com |
|---|---|---|
| Investor frameworks | 7 (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith) | Proprietary scoring |
| AI verdict per stock | Buffett Brain: 5-pillar verdict with reasoning | No structured AI verdict |
| LLM chat / Q&A | Ask Buffett (RAG against Berkshire letters) | None |
| Multi-investor debate | Boardroom: 4 legendary investors debate | None |
| Stock universe | 21,000+ US-focused | US-listed stocks, ETFs, crypto, treasuries, alternative assets |
| Cheapest paid tier | €12/mo equivalent (€144/yr) | Free brokerage; optional Public Premium ~$8/mo for advanced features |
| Lifetime option | €399 one-time (Founders) | No lifetime tier |
| Multi-language UI | EN, DE, FR, ES, PT | English-only (typically) |
| Open verdict cache | Yes: every prompt versioned | Proprietary / opaque |
Wähl Public.com, wenn…
- You want a single app for execution + light research and don't mind that the AI commentary is conversational rather than framework-grounded.
- Fractional shares + social-investing features + alternative-asset access are your primary needs.
Wähl invest-like, wenn…
- You want framework-grounded verdicts, not conversational AI commentary inside a brokerage.
- You want research with no brokerage execution conflict.
- You want multi-investor framework consensus, not a single AI take.
- You need halal screening.
Was Public.com gut macht
- Integrated brokerage execution + research in one app.
- Fractional shares + social-investing features for retail engagement.
- Recently added AI-assisted commentary on individual tickers (Alpha by Public).
Wo invest-like stärker ist
- Seven explicit named investor frameworks per stock with structured pass/fail reasoning, Public.com's AI commentary is conversational, not framework-grounded.
- Buffett Brain delivers a structured 5-pillar verdict, Public.com Alpha generates prose commentary without a structured verdict shape.
- Ask Buffett RAG-grounded against verbatim Berkshire shareholder letters, Public.com's AI is not grounded in named investor primary sources.
- Boardroom 4-investor live debate, unique.
- Halal Mode (AAOIFI Standard 21), Public.com does not ship halal screening.
- Published verdict-accuracy track record with locked entry timestamps, Public.com does not publish AI commentary accuracy.
- invest-like is research-only with no brokerage conflict, Public.com's AI exists inside a brokerage that profits from your trades.
Worüber sich Public.com-Nutzer wirklich beschweren
Wiederkehrende Muster aus öffentlichen Reviews auf Reddit, Trustpilot, G2 und AlternativeTo (2024-2026). Paraphrasiert, keine direkten Zitate.
- AI commentary is conversational and prose-style; users wanting structured verdicts go elsewhere.
- Brokerage UI mixes research and execution in ways some users find distracting.
- Free tier features behind Premium gates on advanced screens.
Wir listen das ehrlich auf, weil wir invest-like genau dafür gebaut haben, all das zu vermeiden: strukturierte Pro-Investor-Analysen (keine intransparente Bewertung), Buffett-Brain-Reasoning ausgeschrieben (keine versteckten Schlüsse), veröffentlichte Methodik und Preise für Privatpersonen, nicht Institutionen.
Häufige Fragen
Is invest-like a Public.com alternative?+
Different layers. Public.com is a brokerage with research bolted on; invest-like is a research-only platform that works alongside any brokerage. Our suggestion: keep your brokerage account (Public.com, Robinhood, Fidelity, IBKR, whichever) and use invest-like for the verdict layer.
Is Public.com's Alpha AI better than Buffett Brain?+
Different products. Alpha generates conversational commentary on individual tickers; Buffett Brain delivers a structured 5-pillar verdict (moat, durability, management, financial health, valuation) with reasoning per pillar plus the six other framework scores. Alpha is conversational; Buffett Brain is structured.
Does invest-like execute trades?+
No. invest-like is research-only with no brokerage relationship. You use whatever brokerage you already have (Public.com, Schwab, Fidelity, IBKR, etc.) for execution. The benefit: no broker-revenue conflict of interest in the research layer.
Does Public.com screen for halal stocks?+
No, not as a first-class feature. invest-like ships AAOIFI Standard 21 on every ticker with a working paper backing the methodology.
Probier invest-like in unter 30 Sekunden
Sieh Dir die Buffett-Analyse zu Apple, NVIDIA oder einer von 21.000+ Aktien an.
Andere Vergleiche
invest-like vs
Simply Wall St
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Stock Unlock
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
TIKR
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
GuruFocus
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
AlphaPicks
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Composer
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Finbox
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Magnifi
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
YCharts
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Zacks
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Morningstar
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Motley Fool
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Value Line
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Seeking Alpha
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Koyfin
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Stock Rover
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Fiscal.ai (formerly FinChat)
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
StockAnalysis.com
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Atom Finance
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Portfolio Visualizer
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Ziggma
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Wisesheets
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
SimplyETF
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
TipRanks
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Danelfin
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Stockopedia
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
Finviz
Vergleich leseninvest-like vs
WallStreetZen
Vergleich lesen